Writing a Testimonial Essay For Your Graduate School Selection

Writing a Testimonial Essay For Your Graduate School SelectionIs it possible to get an essay sample of an original selection by Theresa Spackman? If you have been considering the possibility of taking up a thesis writing course but have not yet decided on the best format for you, you may find this interesting. Those who are interested in pursuing their graduate studies in English would find this to be interesting. However, anyone who wants to look into writing thesis statements would find it interesting.Theresa Spackman is an authority in the area of thesis writing. She has developed her own techniques and applications for writing a thesis statement. She uses a combination of different techniques and applications to make her students as successful as they can be in their thesis writing. So, if you are interested in this particular subject matter, I recommend that you investigate the tools that Theresa Spackman uses.Theresa Spackman's method for writing a thesis statement begins with the students being able to focus on the thesis topic, while only having one page to develop the argument. Students are encouraged to take advantage of their writing abilities and work independently. They can develop a detailed argument that could be presented in more than one form of writing. Students should not have to leave the discussion area to write more material or fill in the blanks. All of the work should be completed in one sitting, with time remaining to finish all of the research.In addition to being able to focus on the thesis topic, students are encouraged to examine the literature surrounding the topic. Spackman also encourages them to develop as many methods of presenting their argument as possible. In fact, she offers a set of guidelines that students can use to help them learn how to develop methods of presenting their argument.Once students have developed their own methods of presenting their arguments, they must combine these with Spackman's three powerful tools f or helping them to develop their own methods of presenting their arguments. One of these tools is provided in the course outline for the course. This outline provides important guidance for the students in developing their own thesis writing technique. Another one is provided through the entire course materials for the course. The third tool is Theresa Spackman's research notes.Theresa Spackman's research notes are important to any individual who is considering attending a graduate school in the area of English. They provide students with a guide to writing for their thesis. Moreover, it can serve as a stepping stone for students to discover what kinds of methods will be needed to express themselves adequately.After you have done the research, you can read the material that was used by Theresa Spackman. These materials include the materials that Spackman uses in her classes as well as the materials that Spackman wrote for her own use. There are also some materials that can be used t o enhance your own thesis writing. That is why they are all worth looking at.

Make Prostitution Legal Essays - Feminism, Human Sexuality

Make Prostitution Legal Prostitution Theory 101 by Yvonne Abraham with Sarah McNaught Few things have divided feminists as much as the sex industry. Theorists who agree on a vast swath of issues -- economic equality, affirmative action, even sexual liberation -- often find themselves bitterly opposed over pornography and prostitution. Most 19th-century feminists opposed prostitution and considered prostitutes to be victims of male exploitation. But just as the suffragette and temperance movements were bound together at the turn of the century, so too were feminist and contemporary moral objections to prostitution. Women, the argument went, were repositories of moral virtue, and prostitution tainted their purity: the sale of sex was, like alcohol, both cause and symptom of the decadence into which society had sunk. By the 1960s and '70s, when Betty Friedan and Germaine Greer asserted that sexual liberation was integral to women's liberation, feminists were reluctant to oppose prostitution on moral grounds. Traditional morality, Greer argued, had helped to repress women sexually, had made their needs secondary to men's. That sexual subordination compounded women's economic and political subordination. Today, some feminists see hooking as a form of sexual slavery; others, as a route to sexual self-determination. And in between are those who see prostitution as a form of work that, like it or not, is here to stay. Radical feminists such as lawyer Catharine MacKinnon and antipornography theorist Andrea Dworkin oppose sex work in any form. They argue that it exploits women and reinforces their status as sexual objects, undoing many of the gains women have made over the past century. Others detect in this attitude a strain of neo-Victorianism, a condescending belief that prostitutes don't know what they're doing and need somebody with more education to protect them. Some women, these dissenters point out, actually choose the profession. Feminists who question the antiprostitution radicals also point out that Dworkin and MacKinnon sometimes sound eerily like their nemeses on the religious right. Phyllis Schlafly, a rabid family-values crusader, has even cited Dworkin in her antipornography promotional materials. This kind of thing has not improved the radicals' image among feminists. At the other extreme from Dworkin and MacKinnon are sex-radical feminists like Susie Bright and Pat Califia. They argue that sex work can be a good thing: a bold form of liberation for women, a way for some to take control of their lives. The problem there, though, is that the life of a prostitute is often more Leaving Las Vegas than Pretty Woman (see Pop Tarts). Many feminists fall somewhere in between the rad-fem and sex-radical poles. Wendy Chapkis, professor of sociology and women's studies at the University of Southern Maine and the author of the Live Sex Acts: Women Performing Erotic Labor (Routledge, 1997), is one of them. For nine years, Chapkis studied prostitution in California and the Netherlands, as well as in Britain and Finland, and conducted interviews with 50 sex workers. Chapkis says she sees the profession as it is: many of her interviews confirmed much of the ugliness that radical feminists abhor, as well as the empowerment that sex radicals perceive. I don't think prostitution is the ultimate in women's liberation, she says. But I think it's better understood as work than as inevitably a form of sexual violence. What prostitutes need, she argues, is not a bunch of goody-goodies looking down on them, but decent working conditions. Chapkis believes prostitution should be decriminalized. Just because it can be lousy work doesn't mean it should be stamped out, she argues. After all, she says, there are lots of jobs in which women are underpaid, underappreciated, and exploited. Criminalizing the profession just exacerbates prostitutes' problems by isolating them from the law and leaving them vulnerable to abusive pimps and johns. In a profession where women traditionally are not treated well, aren't empowered, and should be able to go to the police for protection and assistance, she says, we make the police an extra obstacle, another threat. In the Netherlands, by contrast, where prostitution is decriminalized, police and prostitutes are on the same side: hookers speak at police academies to educate the officers about their work, and Chapkis says the communication pays off in safer working conditions for the women. But what of the radical feminists' claim that prostitution is too patriarchal to be tolerated? Chapkis points out that many things in modern life began as patriarchal institutions -- marriage, for example. Problems within marriage, she says, can be addressed without resorting to abolition: these days, marital property is distributed more fairly, and abused wives have places to go for help. Even Catharine MacKinnon